In last week’s article, I covered the number one red flag that someone is nothing but trouble, which is that they are rude and disrespectful.
In this week’s article, I will be covering the very second red flag that they will end up causing trouble in the long run, but before you scroll down, you might wanna take a wild guess as to what that could be.
Ok, ready?
The answer is ……
Nasty!
They are NASTY!
Whether they are littering the pavement with cigarette butts, or they are scratching behind their ears before handling other people’s food, rudeness and nastiness almost always goes hand in hand. But here’s the thing.
The root cause of nastiness is laziness. Nasty people are stupid and lazy, and that laziness often spills over into rudeness, especially defensive rudeness when you ask them to wear gloves or wash their hands.
Isn’t it funny how everybody suddenly needs a hearing aid as soon as you ask them to wash their dirty hands? Their sudden onset of a hearing impairment is an attempt to gaslight you to cover for their own pride and stubbornness.
Lazy people are inherently stubborn, that is why they are lazy. But if someone is trying to steal your perception of reality by gaslighting you, then that person is being rude by default.
The main reason why they are also prideful is because they think that by complaining, you are suggesting that it is some kind of moral failure on their part. And if that is what they think, then they are right, but not in the way they may think.
It’s only a failure if you complain and they don’t apologize and correct their actions. Or if they actively try to deny it, even to the point of gaslighting you, and projecting onto you for it.
Another reason for their defensiveness is that they think you’re complaining just to scorn them. These are the, “I’m clean! I took a bath!” crowd. And I’m over here like, “yes, you’re clean enough for you, but not clean enough for me.” The moment you picked your nose without washing your hands, you stopped being clean enough for me.
We used to take better pride in cleanliness and good customer service. But then there was a paradigm shift within the social order of society that made the very opposite more widely acceptable. So then what happened?
What happened is that rudeness has become so “fashionable” within society, that all of its kin, including nastiness, has followed suit. And it appears that it didn’t take too long for them to catch up. Now it seems to me that they are inseparable, and that one is not complete without the other.
Solution? Nasty people should never work in restaurants. They should become trash collectors and drain cleaners where they can have the pleasure of revelling in theirs and everybody else’s waste without scrutiny. And if that sounds harsh to you, then let’s raise our standards and enforce them without compromise.
There are some people out there, few as they are, who take a great deal of pride in serving others and doing so wholeheartedly, and thank goodness for those people. They should be the ones who work in restaurants, and be responsible for children and caring for the elderly.
In last week’s article, I discussed the flying monkeys and what makes them want to harass an innocent person. I also touched on the topic of the light bearer, and the fact that most people want to target them for one reason or another. What I didn’t do is to define who exactly the light bearers are. In this article, I will do exactly that.
Let me first begin by reminding you that the first red flag to note when dealing with a normie is that they want to put everybody in a box.
Even if that box isn’t true, or otherwise doesn’t make sense. They can’t just let you live and be yourself. You have to fit one of their pre-determined archetypes, otherwise you don’t exist.
A damn good example of this is when they often ask a pretty Black girl, “Girl, what you mixed with? You a ‘dougla’, or somethin’?”
But that’s a normie for you!
I’ve already mentioned that normies cannot live without group validation. But in order to do so, they have to be fake. Because of that, normies are dead inside, because they sacrificed their true selves a long time ago, just so they could fit in. And because of that, their new life mission is to hunt and destroy anybody who still has their light intact.
But what is the light?
You know when social media influencers often say, “they see your light and they don’t want it to exist?” Or they might say, “normies want to dim your light because it triggers their envy and insecurities.” Funny how they never tell you what the light actually is. No one except for Batel Skater and myself, that is.
When you are born, you have “the light.” No baby is born hating another person, especially over something that they cannot control, such as their age, race, or their gender.
Every baby was born with LIGHT. Some people call them bright stars or chosen ones. Others call them Indigo children. But it doesn’t matter what you call them. The light is something that comes naturally to them.
But then, as soon as they literally come out the vagina, a bunch of different labels and expectations are placed upon them. Labels such as race, nationalism, gender, politics, religion, etc. It is then implied through many years of abuse and control that their true selves are not good enough, and they are then given a script. They are not allowed to be themselves after that.
Most people conform and sacrifice their light for the falsehoods of this fallen world. This is nothing new. History is littered with examples of this. Take the Jim Crow south for example. All of those lynchers were taught to hate. They were also taught not to question the status quo of their time and place.
The few who do not conform are labeled heretics and weirdos, and are hunted with scorn and malice. Yet it is actually their captors whose perspectives are skewed, and who swear they know everything.
This is how hate and prejudice are bred. Yet it is those few whom they have labeled heretics who actually have the light, because their true selves are still intact.
They have to “fix” you into being like them because they cannot understand how you could actually exist without needing them. Only a clown and a false puppet would want to attack or control you simply for existing, and being yourself. The true self doesn’t need to control. It just is.
If you have the light, most normies are going to want to control it for themselves, or abuse you for having it. They envy you for your light because they gave up theirs, so now they want to limit your potential like crabs in a bucket.
Which is funny considering if they had your light, you know they would only use it to control others. If this is how they’re already acting without your light, then you don’t have to imagine what they would actually use it for.
Your light is yours. It is there for your own sustenance. With your light, you can tap into your creativity. It is the very reason why you are able to survive more effectively outside of a group, and actually thrive in some cases.
Your true self is here to serve as an example to others who are watching. An example to destroy the egos and expectations of the false selves.
But ultimately, an example to encourage other light bearers to step up and help you defend the faith in each self and the GOD within. They are going to watch anyway. So we might as well give ‘em one for the ages. They may look but not touch.
This is the final article for 2025. I’ll be going on a two month hiatus beginning next week. All new articles are coming out in February, and I hope you’ll join me then.
In the meantime, I encourage you to read some of my other articles on the site, as well as my new book, The Buckinchere Collection II, available on Amazon and Barnes and Noble.
One of the most sadistic things you can experience is getting into an argument with a narcissist and everybody takes their side. This tends to happen more often than not, and it is particularly frustrating because it makes you feel like you cannot win when dealing with those kinds of people.
Furthermore, it makes the narcissist seem superior to you, and far more popular than you. And with that popularity, they receive the favor of the majority. But why do you think that is? In this article, I will be covering the flying monkey and why they support the narcissist so blindly.
First of all, what is a flying monkey? The term “flying monkey” is a reference to the wicked witch of the west from “The Wizard of Oz” who sent out magical monkeys with wings to do her bidding.
The term is now used within communities that support survivors of narcissistic abuse to describe the henchmen of the narcissist who are all too willing to do the narcissist’s bidding.
Primarily as it relates to stalking, hoovering, enabling, gaslighting and harassment of the former target who has escaped the narcissist’s control. But what kind of person would go out of their way to harass an innocent person who doesn’t want to be bothered? Don’t they have kids, bills and a job to go to?
The answer is that they are weak.
These are weak-willed, mediocre people who are not that smart, not fully right upstairs, satisfied with their lot in life, and are thus easier to control. Those reasons alone are exactly why they are normies.
The first red flag that you are dealing with a normie is that they are loud, fake and satisfied with mediocrity. They also want everybody to be the same. Let’s break it down on an existential level.
First of all, there are many people who were not born because they were loved, planned for, or cared for. They were born out of the simple fact that two jackasses decided to fuck without a condom.
Their parents were stupid, dishonest, and racist. And now they are just as stupid, dishonest, and racist as their parents. Soon they will have children of their own who will more or less turn out the same way, and the vicious cycle continues.
How could you expect those kinds of people to love anyone if their parents never loved them? And how could their parents love them if they never even loved each other, let alone themselves?
Yet from a very early age, the normie knew that it was always hungry, horny and needed money. It also knew that it wasn’t smart enough to sustain life on its own. So what does it do?
It joins other normies at work, or in friend groups, and they all fall in line with a certain pecking order that only they can understand. They appoint a “leader” whose leadership qualities are only apparent from their perspectives, be it a boss, or a popular friend in the group. And that “leader” serves its role while they serve their leader.
They idealize that leader and serve him or her blindly. If that leader wants them to murder an innocent, they will kill that person without question. This is where the danger lies because this is how cults are usually formed.
With that said, not all normies are evil. Most normies are just unawakened, and trying to go about their regular lives. But there is a lot of evil mixed in among the normies and the lines easily become blurred because it’s hard to tell who’s who.
This is where evil comes into play. True evil is silent. It watches. It waits. It befriends. Then it strikes when you least expect it, and in ways you would never consider. It strikes by appearing as normal as any normie, and then taking advantage of the confusion.
Then before you know it, the poor, unsuspecting normies are now part of a friendship gang, or a corporate cult, and the expectation of loyalty makes it hard for them to back out. So they become enablers and go along with evil agendas just for the sake of getting along with everybody.
This is particularly dangerous because these normies are the same kind of people who drank the Kool-aid in the jungles of Jonestown, Guyana in 1978, and history is doomed to repeat itself. Consider yourselves warned!
All normie cults have two scapegoats. One is internal, the other is external. The internal scapegoat is that one friend in the group who everybody low key roasts. And the external one?
He is just the quiet guy who goes to work, minds his business, does his job and goes home without incident, and generally wants nothing to do with them. And everybody HATES him. Why do they hate him?
Because they feel like he is disrespecting their pecking order by not falling in line and worshipping them. Because he has “The Light” and doesn’t want to be exploited for it.
Because they cannot wrap their heads around the notion that he truly doesn’t need anybody, and they want to fix the situation to their preference versus respecting the fact that everybody has a different perspective.
Another reminder of the dangers of group think is that the normie standard is low. They set the bar really low, which makes them low-hanging fruit because of how stupid and easily controllable they all are.
The admission cost to join their group is that you are required to dim your light so that everybody can be the same. And also to eliminate the risk of triggering people’s envy and insecurities. This is exactly why they are fake.
They are so fake, and so stupid, that they fail to realize that it is actually their perspectives that’s grossly skewed.
They’re not for you. You’re not for them. So when you go your own way, and show that you don’t need them, they want to attack you for it.
And because they are all so weak-willed, not only will they stand by as others abuse you, they will literally join in. The “good” one is only quiet, and a spineless follower.
They are also probably thinking, “if I let them roast me, what makes you so special?” Once again, they set the bar really low for themselves, and because they swear their perspectives are correct, they set it low for you, too.
Then the normies celebrate their mediocrity and try to cover up their inherent shame by seeking attention on social media, and going out to nightclubs.
Be ye not deceived. It is all a facade to make themselves seem way cooler than they actually are, and to make you want them because they thrive on your attention.
If you fall for it, then this is how they will trap you. Mind you, these are only normie cults, and not all normies. Smart, creative people DO NOT join cults that target innocent people for no reason.
So what can a light bearer do in this world filled with normies? First of all, what is a light bearer? Join me again next week as I will be discussing it in that article.
Have you ever noticed that the amount of churches in any given city varies by zip code? For example, poorer neighborhoods have more churches (seems like there is one on every corner like a bodega). But tell me how many churches you are able to find in wealthier neighborhoods. I shall wait but I won’t hold my breath.
This is not only true within any one country, but also among countries on an international scale. Why do you think all these self-proclaimed “Prosperity Prophets” are setting up churches all over Nigeria, but not in Denmark?
Why do you think that Ireland, Mexico, and Italy are predominantly catholic, while “whiter” countries are more protestant? The same general concept is true in the United States. The only difference is that we have football, and they have soccer.
Ever wonder why that is? It’s that way by design. Let’s explore some of the historical, geographical, and socio-economic reasons why that is the case.
First of all, wealthy neighborhoods do have churches. But there are very few of them, usually historical landmarks from the time of early settlements in that neighborhood. They are either thoroughly spaced out, or there is only one church, and it’s out on the main boulevard. Either way, their neighborhood is not saturated with a bunch of churches, and I can’t exactly say that I blame them. If I had a million bucks, I wouldn’t waste my time going to church either.
Is it any wonder then, that the wealthy are much further ahead than most normies? And by much further, I do mean light years ahead.
The poor are poor because they inherently have a victim mindset. They say that the laws of a country are not made in the parliament of that country, but in its pubs. With that said, the men of most countries spend their Saturday nights in the pubs of their cities drowning their sorrows in a bottle and commiserating among themselves that they don’t have any money.
Then the very next day, their wives drag them to church kicking and screaming. They are forced to give away 10% of their earnings to people who are already rich, and who don’t pay taxes, just so those people can give them false hope to put their trust in a deity outside of themselves to provide for all of their needs.
All while using their tides to live in one of the historical parts of town where there is only one church. And also to be able to send their kids to college so they one day become your boss and make your life more miserable while you are still stuck at church looking for an answer.
But while commiserating with other men at the pub on Saturday night, they are supposedly “holding each other accountable,” by saying things like, “man up,” or “life is hard,” or “take it like a champ,” or “what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger,” and on it goes. You’ve heard it all before, haven’t you?
Or they might say, “you actually like it easy, you ain’t no real man.” Or, “oh, you just want to leave us all behind for one of those fancy homes in the suburbs. See, I always knew your ass was gay.” Do you know what all those crude remarks are a part of?
Have you ever heard of a little something called, “Poverty Pride?” It’s when you think that hardship makes you stronger, and that softness makes you weak. They literally equate self-care and elegance to weakness.
It’s actually quite pathetic. But I also understand that it is just a coping mechanism to face the daily reality of one’s lot in life being less than what they’d hoped for. Poor men have historically had many coping mechanisms for dealing with the reality of their appointed lot.
Those who don’t drink and beat their wives when they are broke, end up taking it out on their drinking buddies at the pub. Or on the segregated members of society whom they have appointed the permanent underclass of society. Be it African-Americans in the Jim Crow south, or the jews of nazi Germany, or the Romani people of Romania, more famously referred to as gypsies.
Then there are the prosperity preachers who “set up shop” in depressed communities for the sake of exploiting the people’s need to believe that their sustenance somehow lies in the hands of something outside of themselves.
The city planners allow them to do so, and they don’t charge them taxes for it, because they say it’s not for profit. Yet, they get to buy a fancy car every year and send their kids to college. The actual church building may be not for profit, but the pastor’s salary surely is (or should be).
What the prosperity prophets say may sound good to the ears of those who are hungry and desperate. “Hold faith! That job is coming!” Or some may say, “That promotion is coming! That rich, handsome man is coming with the ring and the keys to the mansion.” You get the idea.
By the way, these so-called prophets love to target poor single mothers living in the ghetto. But what they are actually teaching is learned helplessness on a massive scale.
The primary danger of learned helplessness is that anyone who appears like they are coming to help you is really only coming to control you. And if you don’t comply, they will take it away, as well they should. It’s their resource and you must learn to do for yourself.
When they have you standing at the altar, and they are prophesying over your life, how come they never actually say, “you are going to go back to school,” or “you have what it takes to start your own business?”
They never actually tell you how smart and capable you are. But they are always quick to say, “That job is coming! That man is coming! That visa is coming!”
Now here’s the thing to remember. The wealthy pamper themselves without apology. Life is too short, and they work too damn hard for their money not to be able to enjoy it.
So the next time the prosperity preacher tells you that your blessing is right around the corner, you just gotta have faith and give us 10% of your earnings.
Or the next time your loser friends at the pub tell you to tough it out like a man, tell them to tell the prosperity preacher to tough it out. Tell them to tell their boss at work who lives in the historical one-church neighborhood to take it like a man, and see how quickly they don’t get their asses fired.
They always have unsolicited advice for the powerless that conveniently puts the blame right back on the sufferer. Don’t you think that makes them cowardly hypocrites?
In the end, no one is coming to save you. Not your parents. Not your boss. Not your church. Not the demiurge.
It’s the end of the month, and time once again for our monthly review series. Our muse for the month of October is Louise, the titular character from a short story, titled, “Louise’s Ghost.” But before we dig into all the deliciously juicy gore, here’s a disclaimer.
Disclaimer:
The following review contains spoilers. With that said, please support the official release before reading this or any other review on the topic. Without further ado, let’s begin.
Plot:
Louise’s Ghost is a 2001 short story, written by Kelly Link, part of her collection, “Stranger Things Happen.” It was also featured in Peter Straub’s 2008 anthology, “Poe’s Children: A New Horror.”
In the story, there are two women who are friends, both of whom are named Louise. One of them has a toddler named Ana, who only eats green food, and believes that she was a dog in a past life.
The other has a ghost who lives under her bed, and comes out occasionally. The ghost in question is a bald, naked man who sometimes levitates above her bathtub in the middle of the night.
The two Louises meet up for lunch as often as they can to catch up with each other and talk about life. They have known each other since childhood, and have been best friends for a very long time.
Louise calls her mother who lives in a nursing home for advice on how to get rid of the ghost. Her mother suggests salt and water, but has no memory of Louise’s friend named Louise, or her daughter, Ana. This is a very important detail.
It is also revealed that the Louise who is Ana’s mother, only dates cellists due to her belief that they all have low sperm count. Louise would have proximity to cellists considering that she is also involved in stage work.
Louise, on the other hand, only sleeps with married men she meets at her job. She sleeps with them in hotel rooms, then he showers and leaves her there by herself.
Louise tells the cellists about Louise’s ghost, and they become curious and wish to play for the ghost, hoping to gain supernatural talent if one of them can get the ghost to haunt their cello.
Louise agrees and orders catering to host them in her home, hoping they can get the ghost to leave with them. The cellists play as Ana sleeps soundly inside one of the cello cases. They take a cigarette break when the ghost doesn’t appear, and Louise asks Louise if the ghost is even real.
Louise insists it is, but doesn’t try too hard to convince her. All along, she’s had a change of heart, and is in fact, hiding the ghost inside the closet, serenading it with some music of her own that she had previously purchased from a record store.
The cellists return from their cigarette break and continue playing, louder this time, and the lines between fantasy and reality become blurred as Louise pictures herself in a wild orgy with some of the cellists.
Eventually, the ghost hears the cellists playing, and decides that he prefers their music instead. So he shrinks himself, which he tends to do occasionally, and goes to live inside one of their cellos, and they all eventually leave, except for one.
He spends the night with Louise, much to the dismay of her friend who takes Ana and leaves angrily. Realizing the error of her ways, Louise tries to reconcile with Louise for sleeping with her favorite cellist, but to no avail.
Distracted in her fury over her friend’s betrayal, Louise misses her footing one day, falls off the edge of a stage, and dies. Louise is soon contacted by Louise’s attorney who tells her that Louise is dead, and that it was her will for Louise to raise Ana in the event of her untimely death.
Louise is confused because Louise died still angry at her, but eventually she agrees to raise Ana. The two have always had a quarrelsome relationship, and Ana says that she would rather live with her father, who lives in Oregon. Louise tells Ana that she would like Oregon, because it’s green.
Then she arranges for Ana’s father, who is ironically not a cellist, to come and take her away with him. Louise attends a concert in Louise’s honor, hoping to see her ghost. She looks through her opera glasses, and eventually spots Louise’s ghost living inside one of the cellos.
In the end, it is revealed that Louise’s ghost was a story that Charlie, the youth counsellor at their summer camp told them as teenagers about the way their friendship would blossom into adulthood.
The two girls think that Charlie is kinda cool. They think she is pretty, and she lets them ride the horses bareback during the day. But she can get scary at night, especially when she tells them stories by the campfire. They are rather apprehensive of her. Then they hold each other’s hand and look at each other saying, “Are you scared?” “No, are you?” “Not as long as you’re here.”
Analysis:
It seems pretty obvious to me that Louise’s ghost had come presenting the opportunity to bless the cellists with extraordinary gifts due to his fondness of music. Why he didn’t visit the other Louise who had more proximity to the cellists is probably due to her having a daughter, and him not wanting her to see him.
The ghost could also be a manifestation of Louise’s conscience for only sleeping with married men instead of dating cellists the way her friend did. Charlie introducing the element of death in her story only serves to make the story scarier and more believable to the girls who probably don’t scare easily.
This is the kind of story to be told over roasted marshmallows by the campfire. A spooky treat for those cozy autumn nights. I give it a four out of five green marshmallows.
Wanna know the main difference between a psychopath and a sociopath? A psychopath was born that way, and a sociopath was socialized to be that way.
They say that hurt people hurt people. As true as that may be, it is really only half of the story. The other half is that there is literally nothing wrong with some of these people, and it has everything to do with whether they are a psychopath or a sociopath.
A sociopath was born as any baby was born. Full of love and not hating anyone. But as he grew into a man, he was conditioned through abuse and trauma to hate anyone who does not look and sound just like him. He was told to shut up, or to blame others for all his problems.
As such, the sociopath goes through life full of shame, neglect, feelings of unworthiness, a need to project all of his negative self-talk, and an insatiable need for external validation.
All this trauma erodes away at his self-esteem, and ultimately his inner core. The core is your true self, and when it dies, all you have left is your ego. Your ego only cares about survival. Your ego is what tells you that you have to become a monster if you are to survive.
All of your wisdom comes from your inner core, and an ego without the core is unchecked and dangerous. So with his core gone, the sociopath ends up bleeding on those who didn’t cut him.
As a sociopath, it becomes increasingly difficult to form relationships, as you will only alienate potential allies. However, the sociopath’s saving grace is that he wasn’t born sick. With the proper therapy and mental support, he can revert back to his original state. Challenging as it may be, because the ego is stubborn.
Because the ego is stubborn, the sociopath often chooses instead to become fake and join fake normie groups, such as work friendships, shallow friendship groups, church families and family cliques, etc.
They think it is the easiest way to be offered protection. But here’s the catch. Your empathy as well as your loyalty to the group will be tested sooner or later. Normie groups are full of envy, competition and insecure people, and you will be expected to attack an innocent target to prove yourself to the group.
If you refuse, then they will all turn on you. These normie groups are social gangs hiding in plain sight. They are full of peer pressure, and most people sadly end up pandering to the group because they are pathetic, and they want as much as possible to resist upsetting the apple cart.
Ok, that was the sociopath. Then there are psychopaths. There is literally nothing wrong with them, except that they were born sick, and they will never change.
The psychopath only cares about power. Not the many nuances of power that I discussed on this blog site in the month of July. Only control.
They are otherwise fine. They are not starving. They are not sick. They are not homeless. They are not cold. They are not thirsty. They are not dying. They are only CRAZY! Think about it!
A man dying of thirst in the desert is not thinking about control. He is thinking about water. Water and a ride into town. Not even women are at the immediate forefront of his mind at that moment. When he makes it back into town, his true nature will gradually come back as he begins to recover. But when he is dying of thirst in the desert, water is his only concern.
With that analogy in mind, the psychopath will waste water and money for the sake of punishing or blackmailing someone he wants to control.
Imagine that? Wasting resources as scarce and as unrenewable as water and money. Or even food and car fuel. Imagine wasting food because you just don’t want someone else to have it.
Yet the psychopath will literally waste resources because nothing matters more than control to them. They will waste your time and have you going around in circles all day. They will breadcrumb you with droplets of dopamine hits, then pull the rug out from under you so they get an even bigger high. Whenever they wave at you, they’re saying “hi” hoping you would say “how high?”
Anyway, the bottom line is, they will do or say anything, including wasting resources in order to control you. Nothing is more important to them than the game they have in their heads. Does that sound like a hurt person hurting people? Or does that sound like a damned psychopath?
If you are a sociopath, you can either become a sadist or a masochist later in life. The psychopath is a born sadist. Some people are just born sick and there is nothing you can do about it.
Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria is way more common than you think. Men have historically suffered from RSD, but due to the paradigm shift caused by the movement of men going their own way, you may find that women are now more commonly affected than they were previously.
But what exactly is RSD? And more importantly, what is the cause of it?
First of all, the word dysphoria implies an altered state of reality, almost like a delusion of sorts. So then rejection sensitivity dysphoria is a mental disease where the sufferer is sensitive to any form of rejection, real or perceived. The dysphoric aspect of RSD comes into play when you consider that the rejection in question is often more perceived than real.
The most common example of this is that a man might see a girl he likes and thinks he doesn’t have a shot with her because she is way out of his league. And how she can get any man in the world, so why him.
Meanwhile, the girl is probably thinking, “why is he acting so shy? Why won’t he come over and say hi?” As a sidebar, did you know that exceptionally beautiful women tend to be the loneliest?
It’s true! People think they get laid left and right. But in reality, men see them and end up rejecting themselves without knowing her intentions because they are often intimidated by her beauty, class and elegance.
Then she gets lonely and insecure, and ends up picking some douchebag who beats the shit out of her. How’s that for RSD?
The hot, mean girl trope in popular culture doesn’t exactly help matters much either. When in reality, it’s the pretty little normies who are mean and insecure, not Queen Aphrodite.
It doesn’t even make sense for her to be mean, it would only ruin her beauty. The trouble is that Aphrodite is an exceptionally rare form of feminine beauty.
Ok, so now that I’ve gone over some real world examples of RSD, let’s discuss the main cause of it.
Confirmation bias is a double-edged sword that can either make or break you. Positive reinforcement will encourage confidence, while negative reinforcement actually punishes the first sign of it.
So you know how incels always complain that “Chad” easily gets laid? Well it’s not necessarily because Chad is a stunner. It’s because he had a lot of positive reinforcement in his upbringing, and throughout much of his life.
The incel on the other hand, had a lot of negative reinforcements throughout life. A lot of L’s. A lot of setbacks. All of his hopes and endeavors, noble as they are, were literally made to feel like some kind of absurd, dark comedy while the whole world passes him by.
That’s not hard to imagine in a world that rewards evil and punishes creativity and authenticity. That kind of loneliness can really torture a man’s mind. So they develop a sensitivity to rejection, coupled with dysphoria.
This is something that plays out over time. And as such, they end up rejecting others before others have a chance to reject them. That way, they feel more in control of their experiences.
In last week’s article, we talked about the different forms of addiction. One particular example was the lust for power due to feelings of neglect or the general lack of safety in one’s background. Well proactive rejection perpetuated by sufferers of RSD is but one example of that power lust.
The incel may internalize his negative reinforcements as being due to his lack of height, or the way his face looks. But in reality, it really could be due to neurodiversion.
Having mental conditions such as; OCD, ADHD, or being on the autism spectrum could increase the likelihood of developing RSD at some point. But if you asked me, I would say it’s because the incel didn’t reject his true self in order to conform to the normie script.
As such, incels often go deeper into nihilism and loneliness, where they develop unhealthy coping habits, such as porn addiction and the like. They may also form online hate groups where they vent their frustration in the form of racism and misogyny.
None of these habits are healthy. The thing to do is to seek counseling. It will help you to further explore the root cause of your inceldom, as well as your RSD, on a path towards leading a healthier lifestyle. In time, you may even regain the confidence to start dating again.
Let’s talk about obesity for a sec. No offense, but do you ever wonder why some people are fat? Though there are many nuances involved, I’m pretty sure that in most cases, the people who are overweight are suffering from a binge disorder. But what is a binge disorder?
Binging is an overindulgence in any hedonistic activity that tethers on the brink of decadence (see: Hedonism vs. Decadence), and could eventually lead to harm. Examples of this could be food, weed, alcohol, sex, porn, television (especially online streaming), etc.
Indulging is fine so long as you keep it in moderation. But overindulgence is a binge, and excessive amounts of binging now becomes a disorder. Ok, great! Now what causes people to overindulge?
Perhaps there was a time while growing up when there was never enough to eat. Similar to people who become obsessed with power in adulthood because they never had any autonomy in childhood, and it had put them in harm’s way, so does the person who never had enough to eat start binging the moment they had the extra income to be able to afford more food.
I once had a classmate who had plenty of kids, more than she can probably afford. Her father died when she was young, and she and her mother hate each other. So now she is resolute in creating the family she never had growing up, where she is surrounded by a bunch of kids who she feels would be there to love her forever.
But what happens when the kids grow up and want to live lives of their own? She probably never thought about that, but I did, for I am such a child. My guess is that her kids will likely develop a binge disorder that’s shrouded in some kind of solitude and autonomy.
When I was growing up, our house was the revolving door for all of the neighborhood kids. This is because my brother is an extravert, and likes talking to everybody. Still have no idea how we even ended up being born in the same family, but today, I won’t even say hi to my neighbors.
Then there is the issue of sexual repression. A man who is going through a dry spell may develop an addiction at the pornographic level due to sexual frustration. Then when he finally graduates to the real deal, that porn addiction might turn into a sex addiction.
He may become addicted to the act itself. But once he realizes that his girlfriend cannot keep up, he may cheat on her with multiple women, some of whom may be escorts. Then he will eventually become addicted to the escorts.
Choosing to see escorts is one thing, but becoming addicted to them will lead to bankruptcy. Speaking of bankruptcy, a man will likely become a workaholic if there was never enough money going around while he was growing up.
Perhaps he was surrounded by crabs in a bucket. Then they probably lied that it was all due to a generational curse. Or it could just be that he was geolocked due to his time and place.
Whatever it is, he will likely become obsessed with overachievement, and workaholism will become his binge of choice. Binging may feel satisfying at first, but as with all things that you choose to abuse, consistent binging always ends in disaster.
Food binges lead to obesity and hypertension. Porn addiction leads to wasted time, and neglecting your real world relationships and obligations. Sex addiction will eventually lead to bankruptcy. Alcoholism will lead to DUIs. And workaholism will lead to premature ageing.
A binge disorder can be outgrown with time and understanding. Sadly, there are some who never outgrow their binge. It becomes a permanent aspect of their character.
The key is in being able to recognize the root cause of your binge disorder. Forgive yourself for the scarcity in your early life that caused the binge, and consider some possible alternatives that could lead to a healthier future.
One possible alternative is in recognizing that the unconscious urge to hoard is not the answer. You begin to heal by making the concerted effort to learn the discernible difference between quality and quantity, and then choosing quality every time.
It is the end of the month and time once again for our monthly review series. Our muse for the month of September is none other than Miss Sadie Thompson. But first, here’s a disclaimer.
Disclaimer:
The following review contains spoilers, so I strongly recommend watching any film that features the character of Sadie Thompson before reading this or any review relating to this muse. Now without further ado, let’s begin.
Introduction:
Sadie Thompson is a fictional character appearing in several films, plays and prose between the 1920s and the 1950s. Her first appearance was in a 1921 short story titled, “Rain,” by W. Somerset Maugham, part of his collection titled, “The Tremling of a Leaf.”
In film, her most notable portrayals were by Gloria Swanson as the titular Sadie Thompson in a 1928 silent picture directed by Raoul Walsh. And by Joan Crawford in “Rain,” a 1932 talking picture directed by Lewis Milestone, and the one that I will be reviewing today.
Plot:
Sadie Thompson is a young woman who is stranded on the Pacific island of Pago Pago. Outgoing by nature, Sadie enjoys drinking, smoking and partying with some of the young sailors she meets during her stay at an inn on the island. Much to the dismay of Alfred Davidson (Walter Huston), a brooding old missionary and religious zealot who complains that she is disturbing him and his wife.
Her sassy demeanor soon catches the eye of one of the sailors at the inn, one Sergeant O’Hara (William Gargan). As Sadie starts falling for O’Hara, Davidson starts digging into Sadie’s past and learns that she is a prostitute. He also discovers that she is wanted by the police in San Francisco.
Meanwhile, Sadie’s new boyfriend, O’Hara, whom she affectionately calls “handsome” throughout the picture, tells her about a friend of his who fell in love with a prostitute. They are now happily married and living in Australia. O’Hara wants to take Sadie away with him to Australia so she doesn’t have to answer for her previous crimes in San Francisco.
But just as he is making plans for them to join his friend, Davidson starts working on Sadie’s psyche. First he threatens to use his influence with the governor on that island to make certain that Sadie is sent back to San Francisco. Then he uses guilt and shame to convince her to seek repentance for her promiscuous ways.
As Davidson’s manipulation takes root and he continues to break down Sadie’s will, he finds it easier to convince her that the only way to truly repent is to willfully go back to San Francisco and face the punishment for her past crimes. She agrees and O’Hara notices that she is not being herself and tries to snap her out of it, but she pushes him away and insists that she needs to be “saved.”
Brainwashed and isolated from her friends, Davidson has free reign over Sadie’s mind and dictates her every action right down to the way that she dresses. With a newfound obsession with purity, Sadie soon begins to dress more modestly and without make-up.
Eventually she agrees to return to San Francisco and Davidson admires her as a “beautiful creature of god.” However, in the next split second, he loses control and breaks into her room where he rapes her.
The natives find Davidson’s body washed ashore the following morning. Suicide or murder? Who knows. Any scenario is possible. Devastated, Sadie reverts back to her old self again and leaves for Australia along with O’Hara to begin their lives anew.
Key Takeaway:
Davidson tried to brainwash Sadie into becoming someone she is not. While all along, he was secretly lusting after her despite being a married man, and lost control in the end. It is ironic that his losing control made Sadie revert back to her true self.
O’Hara loved and accepted Sadie as she was. She didn’t have to change her character, perhaps only her profession after they had gotten married. It just goes to show you that anybody who is trying to make you change does not love you, they only want to control you.
Another red flag that let’s me know Davidson was working her nerves was when he said that god wouldn’t forgive her unless she went back and faced the penalty for her past mistakes. Assuming god was benevolent, it wouldn’t want you to suffer for your past mistakes.
The point would’ve been to correct you and not to humiliate you, especially if it was a “victimless crime” that you committed out of lack and fear. There are those who are intentionally wicked who actually get rewarded in this world while those trying to do the right thing must suffer for the ego of the wicked. Religious hypocrisy at its finest.
And who is Davidson to lead anybody to salvation when he cannot even control himself? But the first red flag of all was when he led with threats in the first place. The heat check is the oldest trick in the book.
If they heat check you and you let it slide, that’s how they know they’ve got you. I give this cautionary tale on overzealous religious sadism and the malignant mentor a four out of five jazz listening tramps, and I’ll see you on the next one.
Incels are heroes. Yet they ironically don’t seem to get enough respect. Instead, all they tend to receive is shame and mockery at the hands of the very people they protect. In this article, I will explain why that is, and what can be done about it.
First of all, what is an incel? Short for involuntary celibacy, an incel is a man who is unable to get laid, or otherwise date by traditional or conventional means. Society, including women tend to shame and bully incels due to their social ineptitude, as well as their inability to live a normal life.
The stereotype of an incel is a middle-aged, balding, Pakistani janitor, or some pasty White boy who wears a tinfoil hat and lives in his mother’s basement. But those are just stupid, annoying and offensive tropes. Any age or race of man can be an incel.
Now I did start off by saying that incels are heroes. Let me tell you why that is. Sexual gratification is the most important thing to a man. More important than food. Sexual pressure can be compared to sleep pressure, in that the longer you go without it, the more intense it becomes. And when a man is being sexually repressed, his mind will go to some very dark places.
Any man who is burning with rage and sexual frustration can easily choose to rape women. So if a man is an incel, he is choosing to respect a woman’s consent more than he respects his own selfish desires.
That is most commendable, considering that there are men who get laid regularly who still choose to rape women for the sake of power. I am not saying that incels deserve a Purple Heart for doing what they are supposed to be doing anyway. But you also don’t have to mock them for it. Then the same stupid normies who delight in provoking incels end up playing the victim when the incel finally snaps.
Another way that incels cope with loneliness and frustration is to seek the services of a prostitute. Which is a problem because as I had discussed in the last two to three articles, normies do not like sex work. Why do you think that is?
Sex work supports male sexual autonomy and restores male sexual dignity. Not only for incels, but also for the willfully single or the intentional bachelor. Especially men who do not wish to go through the headache of modern dating. Foodie calls are a thing.
Furthermore, no normie would ever give it away for free, nor would she ever sell it so cheap and easy, because they love to leverage it in exchange for POWER and favors.
Normies vastly outnumber the eccentrics and so they define the status quo. The normie status quo often involves hierarchies, pecking orders, and subtle forms of tyranny disguised either as friendship or co-worker camaraderie. They pick their leader by natural selection, often implying, “it’s a normie thing, you wouldn’t understand,” and all the normies just naturally fall in line without question.
They also need a permanent underclass to project their shame and mediocrity upon, often implying, “well at least we’re not like those guys,” or “don’t be that guy.” Anyone who even remotely threatens the status quo will be seen as an enemy whom the normies will seek to destroy any which way they can. How can the normies mock incels if escorts are restoring their dignity?
Was it not the normie wives of 1917 who pressured their normie husbands who were lawyers and congressmen at the time to criminalize prostitution? And did they not leverage their cookie (or the threat of lack) in order to get their husbands to comply?
Normies are the gatekeepers of society. Their job is to please their appointed master by keeping eccentrics whom they have labeled heretics in our so-called places. There are no natural incels. An incel is the end result of societal gatekeeping. He is unique for his time and place, and he is also geo-locked due to poor finances.
So when an incel hires a prostitute, both will be shunned and punished, whether financially, legally, or socially. They HATE the prostitute because they can no longer shame the incel.
Finally, for those women who actually have a mind of their own, and who are not total psychopaths, it’s ok to be nice. Whenever next you see an incel, give him a smile and remember that he put your consent ahead of his needs. You don’t have to thank him, you just have to honor his basic human dignity.
Prostitution is the world’s oldest profession, and also the most hated. So much so to the extent that it is still illegal in many parts of the world in 2025. Some of the excuses that are often given for criminalizing sex work are as follows:
We are not able to tax and regulate the industry
It is generally a shady industry that attracts drugs, fights, etc.
It breeds exploitation/human trafficking, etc.
Prostitutes tend to spread STDs
We don’t want to encourage promiscuity
When in reality, they probably don’t want to give men the option to still get laid if he wishes to remain a bachelor. After all, relationships produce families, and the system needs new taxpayers every twenty years or so.
If they really wanted to eliminate the risk of human trafficking, only pimps would be criminalized, but not the buying and selling of sex. Prostitution, like any other form of exhibitionism, is a form of expression, and criminalizing it is a hypocritical violation of the first amendment of the American constitution that explicitly defends both freedom of assembly and freedom of expression.
When done correctly, sex work can be a victimless crime, because both men and women are free to do what they want with their bodies and their money. So why do so many people have such a problem with it? Why don’t we all just leave them alone?
First of all, why do people turn to sex work? More specifically, why do women become prostitutes and why do men seek their comfort?
There are several reasons for this, the most common of which is freedom. Women want to use their beauty and sexual prowess to make money without having to be masochistically frightened from sleep by an alarm clock. Then drive through rush hour traffic to go to a job they hate, surrounded by people they hate.
They have pretty faces and nice bodies and they are smart enough to capitalize off that without shame. Speaking of shame, they also don’t mind sleeping with multiple men at the same time. They have denounced sexual shame and have fully embraced who they are. As such they are smart enough, and honest enough to charge for it instead of giving it away for free.
Speaking of honesty, they are not out to play games and lead you on. They are very pragmatic about what men want, and are willing to indulge their male clients in a frank and upfront, no BS, exchange. They figured, “I want money. He wants pussy. So we doing this, or not?” If you don’t like headaches, she’s your girl.
That level of pragmatism is a very masculine mindset to have. Even though she presents with femininity, the way she thinks is masculine. Which means that she is very calculating, but in a good way. But just because her services are transactional by nature doesn’t mean she is not having fun.
She thoroughly enjoys the company of her male clients. It’s just that she is smart enough to get paid for having a good time. They figured out the secret a long time ago, otherwise it wouldn’t be the world’s oldest profession.
Then there are the men who seek her comfort, and the question of why. For the man who is married, it is either he feels ignored by his wife at home, or he was in way over his head when he thought he was able to commit to one woman for the rest of his life.
Men are naturally polygamous (enter ludus and playful detachment) and most women are naturally monogamous (eros). So what that simply means is that while men are looking for sex, women are looking for commitment.
It is very difficult for a man who has stayed true to his polygamous nature to find a like-minded woman among normies because normies are one dimensional neurotypicals. Any woman who is like-minded would either have to be a swinger/cuckquean or an escort. So it’s either a married man cheats on his wife with an escort, or he respects the nature of neurotypical women and chooses to stay single so he can be married to the only industry that is dedicated to his nature.
This makes a lot of people angry because they love to control the male phallus. And when they can’t control you, they try to destroy you for it. That is why the world’s oldest profession is still illegal in 2025.
That is also why most jobs will fire you if they ever were to find out how you really get laid. Or why your wife will divorce you and sue you for alimony. To keep money out of your pocket so you can’t just sleep around as you wish.
For many men, building a connection with an escort, albeit transactional, is the most honest relationship they will ever have in their entire lives. There are literal billionaires who are able to keep their blinders on by paying them to leave. Then there are the incels who literally don’t have any other means of getting laid.
This is as good as it will ever get for them, yet even their dicks are being constantly policed by society. If you are an incel, society wants to keep you in poverty indefinitely. The gatekeepers are numerous; from family, to friends, to coworkers, to normie girls. You won’t be able to escape them.
This is why you should never marry if that is the lifestyle you want to live. If you value your freedom, you should never marry in the first place. The moment you put a ring on it, it’s no longer about you.
The short of it is that marriage is pushed with no regard to your male nature, while sexual liberty is shamed and sabotaged. People fear what they cannot control. It is the same reason why they hate atheists.
It is true that sex work is a shady industry. So how will cleaning it up help to change people’s opinion of it when shadiness was never the underlying issue? But don’t they realize that people still do what the fuck they want regardless? They are not stopping anything over there. Tyrants will never learn.
Everybody wants to be loved, but not everybody wants to love. This is due to the fact that when most people think about love, they are only thinking about one kind, erotic love. Due to this confusion, hidden resentment and frustration tends to build under the surface.
Mainly due to the fact that one believes they are only allowed one type of love, and to accept that one type is to reject all the other types. But did you know that there are actually six different types of love? In this week’s article, I will explore each of the six love types and languages.
Storge:
Often used interchangeably with philos, storge is a platonic kind of love. A love of friends and brothers. A love for one’s brethrens and comrades at arms. Though not inherently altruistic, storge is the main form of love that has sustained society throughout the ages.
It has given men something to bond over that is worth defending, be it country, church or a good game of football. When storge is gone, collapse is imminent. Think of the most decadent days of the Roman Empire for example. I recommend that you read my comparison between hedonism and decadence.
Mania:
When they say that there is a thin line between love and hate, this is the kind of love they are referring to. Because true love has a thick line that separates it from hate, a very thick line. But when one feels rejected whether real or perceived and love is not present, they will enter into madness and seek your destruction.
This is NOT love, this is control. While you squander your life away loving someone, they only love hurting you. Stop romanticizing these toxic fairytale ideas of a relationship. You have been warned.
Agape:
An altruistic kind of love, a love for humanity as a collective. Agape requires one to be a bit naive because in order for one to be altruistic towards society as a whole, one would also have to assume that humanity is inherently benevolent. That thought by itself requires one to be somewhat naive, because humans have never been inherently benevolent.
Yes, there are some benevolent qualities that allowed for the building of ships, planes, and for creativity to flourish. But most normies have always been out for themselves since the dawn of time, and will continue doing so until our star turns into a black hole and swallows the earth.
Anyone who practices agape without being affected by the consequence would likely have god-like powers to be able to cover the immediate shortfall. But for the average person, the practice of agape is a huge liability. Being part of a group offers some leverage. But still, there are no guarantees.
Eros:
Erotic love, the love that a man has for a woman and vice versa. This is specifically a love between one man and one woman, otherwise called monogamy. The idea behind eros is that a man should commit to one woman and one woman only for the remainder of his days.
Which is unreasonable to expect because men are inherently polygamous. So when a woman accuses a man of having commitment issues for wanting to date other women, she is saying that he doesn’t have eros, and she is correct. Because what he actually has is…..
Ludus:
The love of playful detachment and non-commitment. The love that a philanderer has for each of his muses. A man who practices ludus may take on many lovers at a time, and may only seek to have fun versus the responsibilities and expectations of eros. Most normies do not like when men do this, and always seek to sabotage him for it.
Perhaps they don’t understand his reasons for choosing to live this way. Ludus is not unethical so long as there are no unspoken expectations, and everyone involved agrees to the terms and conditions of a ludus relationship. In order to understand a man’s motivations for practicing ludus, we would have to explore the sixth love language, which is…..
Philautia:
The love of self and a vested interest in self-preservation. More prominent among men than women, philautia is the interest in ensuring that one avoids anything that will become a burden at some point. This is because men are more self-centered while women are more male centered.
For this reason, men are more ludus oriented than women because then he gets to have his cake and eat it too. Then she gets upset and calls him selfish when his nature commands that he practices ludus or philautia.
Conclusion:
Everyone has a different love language. What’s right for you may not be right for others. But with transparency and effective communication, everyone can get to where they are going. And most importantly, with whom.
So tell me, what is your love language, and who are you most compatible with based on that? Give it some thought, and let me know in the comment section below. Thanks for reading, and I’ll see you on the next one.